ISIL seen as non-Islamic cult by Mideast intelligence services by Wayne Madsen

 ISIL seen as non-Islamic cult by Mideast intelligence services

Middle Eastern intelligence services have reported to WMR that they believe that the so-called "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant," or ISIL, also known as "Islamic State" and "Islamic State of Iraq and Sham," is actually a quite non-Islamic cult developed by Israel and the Central Intelligence Agency and funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to destabilize the entire Middle East and beyond.

Currently, ISIL ranks include some 12,000 volunteers from 81 different countries. A large number of these volunteers, recruited from social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, have no family links to Islam. Examples are Abdullah Elmir, a red-haired convert to Islam from Bankstown in southwest Sydney, and Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, a convert to Islam who was adopted by a Libyan stepfather. Elmir, whose mother is Australian and father is Lebanese, threatened in a recent video that ISIL will soon fly its flag over every capital city in the world.

Zehaf-Bibeau, who has been linked to ISIL by the Stephen Harper government, was a petty criminal from Laval, north of Montreal. He was shot to death on October 22 by the Canadian Parliament's Sergeant-at-Arms after he allegedly shot and killed a Canadian army troop standing guard at Canada's Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and then stormed the Parliament building.

Of the some 100 French women and teens recruited by ISIL, only 20 percent are Muslims. The remainder are Catholics and Jews. Among the 60 Australians known to have joined ISIL, many are not Muslims.

Shannon Conley, 19, of Arvada, Colorado, who is not a Muslim, was arrested in April by the FBI as she boarded a plane at Denver International Airport to fly to Syria to fight for ISIL. Recently, the FBI apprehended three female teens from Denver who were trying to board a flight in Germany to fight for ISIL in Syria.

Iranian, Syrian, and Lebanese intelligence services now believe that ISIL is actually a nihilist mind control death cult, similar to those like the People's Temple, the Raelians, and the satanic Temple of Set, which were all incubated under the CIA's MK-ULTRA program. These intelligence services see a comparison between ISIL volunteers and young people who have carried out grisly attacks prompted by on-line urgings of a fictional stalking character named "Slender Man." Earlier this year, urgings from Slender Man were said to have prompted two 12-year old Wisconsin girls to repeatedly stab a 12-year old classmate and a 13-year old Ohio girl to stab her mother with a knife. Later, a 14-year old Port Richey, Florida girl, again reportedly at the urging of Slender Man, tried to burn her home down while her mother and 9-year old brother were inside.

Middle East intelligence analysts now believe that the same type of mind control activities are being used to recruit Muslims and non-Muslims, alike, to volunteer for ISIL, which is not much different from the fictional Slender Man in promoting murder and heinous acts on innocent people.

  
"Caliph" al-Baghdadi, aka Simon Elliot, [left]: Israeli Mossad agent and an Israeli Jewish version of Slenderman [right]?

Family members of ISIL's red-haired new video spokesman Elmir claim that the young man has been "brainwashed." Australia's Fairfax Media quoted Professor Greg Barton of Monash University in Australia as bolstering the on-line predatory nature of ISIL:

It's like sexual predation . . . Somebody might strike up a friendship in an online chat forum and present themselves in a different fashion - to try to get them into their web . . . He's [Elmir's] not in charge of his own destiny at all; he's being used."

The self-proclaimed "Caliph" of ISIL's "Islamic State," Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who was photographed with Senator John McCain and his fake PhD traveling partner Elizabeth O'Bagy in Syria last year, is reported by some circles to actually be Simon Elliot, an Israeli Jewish Mossad agent.

Middle Eastern intelligence services have also established a link between non-Muslim Japanese volunteers in ISIL and the Aum Shinrikyo cult that carried out the deadsly sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway system in 1995. A small number of Japanese volunteers known to have links to Aum Shinrikyo have traveled to Turkey where they have joined up with ISIL.

ISIL has also attracted members of Mumbai's Goth cults who are known for their grotesque and non-traditional body piercings. Some of these Indian members of ISIL, both Muslim and Hindu, have already been discovered operating inside Iran.

What is frustrating for Syrian, Iranian, and Lebanese intelligence is the fact that these recruitment activities for ISIL on Turkish soil are not only known to the Turkish MIT intelligence service but facilitated by it.

What Obama Didn't Say in His Cairo Address Speaks Volumes About His Mideast Policy Noam Chomsky

What Obama Didn't Say in His Cairo Address Speaks Volumes About His Mideast Policy Noam Chomsky Alternet, June 4, 2009

A CNN headline, reporting Obama's plans for his June 4 address in Cairo, Egypt, reads "Obama looks to reach the soul of the Muslim world." Perhaps that captures his intent, but more significant is the content hidden in the rhetorical stance, or more accurately, omitted. Keeping just to Israel-Palestine -- there was nothing substantive about anything else -- Obama called on Arabs and Israelis not to "point fingers" at each other or to "see this conflict only from one side or the other." There is, however, a third side, that of the United States, which has played a decisive role in sustaining the current conflict. Obama gave no indication that its role should change or even be considered. Those familiar with the history will rationally conclude, then, that Obama will continue in the path of unilateral U.S. rejectionism. Obama once again praised the Arab Peace Initiative, saying only that Arabs should see it as "an important beginning, but not the end of their responsibilities." How should the Obama administration see it? Obama and his advisers are surely aware that the initiative reiterates the longstanding international consensus calling for a two-state settlement on the international (pre-June 1967) border, perhaps with "minor and mutual modifications," to borrow U.S. government usage before it departed sharply from world opinion in the 1970s. That's when the U.S. vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution backed by the Arab "confrontation states" (Egypt, Iran, Syria), and tacitly by the PLO, with the same essential content as the Arab Peace Initiative, except that the latter goes beyond by calling on Arab states to normalize relations with Israel in the context of this political deal. Obama has called on the Arab states to proceed with normalization, studiously ignoring, however, the crucial political settlement that is its precondition. The initiative cannot be a "beginning" if the U.S. continues to refuse to accept its core principles, even to acknowledge them. In the background is the Obama administration's goal, enunciated most clearly by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to forge an alliance of Israel and the "moderate" Arab states against Iran. The term "moderate" has nothing to do with the character of the state, but rather signals its willingness to conform to U.S. demands. What is Israel to do in return for Arab steps to normalize relations? The strongest position so far enunciated by the Obama administration is that Israel should conform to Phase I of the 2003 Road Map, which states: "Israel freezes all settlement activity (including natural growth of settlements)." All sides claim to accept the Road Map, overlooking the fact that Israel instantly added 14 reservations that render it inoperable. Overlooked in the debate over settlements is that even if Israel were to accept Phase I of the Road Map, that would leave in place the entire settlement project that has already been developed, with decisive U.S. support, to ensure that Israel will take over the valuable land within the illegal "separation wall" (including the primary water supplies of the region), as well as the Jordan Valley, thus imprisoning what is left, which is being broken up into cantons by settlement/infrastructure salients extending far to the east. Unmentioned as well is that Israel is taking over Greater Jerusalem, the site of its major current development programs, displacing many Arabs, so that what remains to Palestinians will be separated from the center of their cultural, economic and sociopolitical life. Also unmentioned is that all of this is in violation of international law, as conceded by the government of Israel after the 1967 conquest, and reaffirmed by Security Council resolutions and the International Court of Justice. Also unmentioned are Israel's successful operations since 1991 to separate the West Bank from Gaza, since turned into a prison where survival is barely possible, further undermining the hopes for a viable Palestinian state. It is worth remembering that there has been one break in U.S.-Israeli rejectionism. President Clinton recognized that the terms he had offered at the failed 2000 Camp David meetings were not acceptable to any Palestinians, and in December, proposed his "parameters," vague but more forthcoming. He then announced that both sides had accepted the parameters, although both had reservations. Israeli and Palestinian negotiators met in Taba, Egypt, to iron out the differences, and made considerable progress. A full resolution could have been reached in a few more days, they announced in their final joint press conference. But Israel called off the negotiations prematurely, and they have not been formally resumed. The single exception indicates that if an American president is willing to tolerate a meaningful diplomatic settlement, it can very likely be reached. It is also worth remembering that the George W. Bush administration went a bit beyond words in objecting to illegal Israeli settlement projects, namely, by withholding U.S. economic support for them. In contrast, Obama administration officials stated that such measures are "not under discussion," and that any pressures on Israel to conform to the Road Map will be "largely symbolic," the New York Times reported (Helene Cooper, June 1). There is more to say, but it does not relieve the grim picture that Obama has been painting, with a few extra touches in his widely heralded address to the Muslim World in Cairo on June 4.