Showing posts with label Luis Posada Carriles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Luis Posada Carriles. Show all posts

Friday, November 06, 2015

Jeb Bush interfered with FBI murder investigation while in Caracas by Wayne Madsen




 Jeb Bush interfered with FBI murder investigation while in Caracas
by Wayne Madsen
Knowledgeable FBI sources have told WMR that while Jeb Bush was the vice president for Texas Commerce Bank's operations in Caracas, Venezuela from 1977 to 1979, he provided the Central Intelligence Agency with high-level interference against an FBI investigation of two right-wing Cuban exile leaders for their roles in the September 21, 1976 terrorist car bombing in Washington, DC. The car bomb killed former Chilean foreign minister Orlando Letelier and his American adviser Roni Moffitt on Sheridan Circle in broad daylight.

WMR previously reported, for the first time, that Jeb Bush received a top-level security and operational briefing from the CIA in 1977, prior to his two-year stint in Caracas in a job that is normally reflective of a CIA non-official cover (NOC) posting. 

When the FBI sought to interview Luis Posada Carriles, a Cuban exile who ran a private investigative CIA front company in Caracas called Company of Commercial and Industrial Research CA, a front for CIA anti-Cuba terrorist activities in the region, and his colleague Orlando Bosch, Bush pressed the government of President Carlos Andres Perez and Venezuela's intelligence agency, DISIP, to provide interference against the FBI's wish to interview both Cubans. Although the CIA, at the time, was headed by President Jimmy Carter's friend and Annapolis classmate Admiral Stansfield Turner, George H. W. Bush, the previous CIA director, counted many loyalists among the CIA ranks, who symied the FBI's investigation of Carriles and Bosch. Eventually, the FBI did manage to collect enough evidence to have three Cuban-Americans in the employment of the Chilean intelligence service DINA and the CIA -- Alvin Ross Díaz and two brothers, Guillermo and Ignacio Novo Sampoll, indicted for the murders of Letelier and Bosch. The FBI was also investigating Carriles and Bosch for ordering the bombing of Cubana flight 455, which was blown up by two time bombs on October 6, 1976, after taking off from Bridgetown, Barbados.


Jeb Bush thanking CIA security director for his 1977 pre-Caracas intelligence briefing. Jeb's tasking in Caracas included covering up the 1976 murders of Orlando Letelier and Roni Moffitt and running interference for the CIA is stymieing the FBI's investigation of two Caracas-based Cuban CIA agents.

A U.S. CIA agent, Michael Townley, the son of John Vernon Townley, a veteran CIA agent in Chile and Venezuela, was found guilty of placing the car bomb that killed Letelier and Moffitt. However, after his 62 month prison sentence, Townley was released into the Federal Witness Protection Program. The three Cuban-Americans found guilty later saw their convictions overturned on a technicality and they were released into the Cuban-American community of Miami-Dade where Jeb Bush has received much of his political support over the years. Another wanted fugitive in the murder of Letelier and Moffitt, Virgilio Paz Romero, was captured in 1991 in Boynton Beach, Florida where he lived under an assumed name. He was given a 12 year prison sentence after pleading guilty but was paroled after just six years.


Wanted for accessory to murder: One-time CIA NOC agent Jeb Bush.

After blocking the FBI's probe of the CIA's Cuban exile CORU (
Coordination of United Revolutionary Organizations) operations in Caracas in the 1976 car bombing in Washington and the downing of the Cubana airliner, both accomplished with the knowledge and support of then-CIA director George H W Bush, Jeb started up his various businesses in Miami with the assistance of the city's wealthy Cuban-American elite. However, Jeb Bush's political career in Florida was built on the graves of Letelier, Moffitt, and the passengers and crew of Cubana flight 455.

There are open homicide cases against the Cuban murderers of Letelier, Moffitt, and the 73 passengers and crew of Cubana flight 455 before Argentine, Chilean, Venezuelan, and Spanish courts. Jeb Bush faces potential extradition to all four countries to answer questions under oath about his participation in the cover-up of CIA assassination squads operating out of Caracas in the late 1970s.

Monday, August 31, 2015

Will U.S. finally pay reparations for its act of terrorism? by Wayne Madsen




Will U.S. finally pay reparations for its act of terrorism?
by Wayne Madsen
For the people of Cuba, Barbados, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela, October 6, 1976 will always be remembered as the day international terrorism paid a deadly call on the Caribbean region. It was on that day that a Cubana airlines DC-8 aircraft was blown out of the sky by a bomb placed on the aircraft by right-wing Cuban exiles. The bombing of the plane, Cubana flight 455, which had just departed from Seawell Airport in Barbados and was en route to Jamaica, killed 73 people, including children. The chief terrorist technician was Luis Posada Carriles, however, the mastermind was the then-director of the Central Intelligence Agency, one George H. W. Bush. Carriles lives today a free man in Miami where he supports a number of right-wing Cubano groups, all of which are closely linked to GOP 2016 presidential hopefuls Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush.

Carriles and three other Cuban exiles, Freddy Lugo, Hernán Ricardo Lozan, and Orlando Bosch, were arrested in Venezuela for bombing the plane. Bosch was acquitted and he moved to Miami where he lived until his death in 2011. Lugo and Lozan received 20 year sentences in Venezuela and Posada Carriles was jailed for eight years prior to his escaping to Florida before his final sentencing hearing. Carriles carried out his acts of terrorism in the Caribbean region from his base in Caracas, where he operated a security company called Investigaciones Comerciales y Industriales C.A. (ICICA). In addition to the CIA, Carriles worked closely with Miami- and Las Vegas-based Jewish mobster Frank "Lefty" Rosenthal.

1976 saw the CIA under then-director George H. W. Bush carry out a number of terrorist acts against Cuba and companies and countries that did business with Havana. Bush's Cuban associates also bombed the offices of British West Indies Airlines in Bridgetown, Barbados, the Guyanese embassy in Port of Spain, Trinidad; the Air Panama office in Colombia, the Iberia office in Costa Rica, and the Venezuelan mission to the UN in New York. They also committed an arson attack on Cuban-supplied fishing equipment in Guyana and assassinated Cuban officials in Mexico and Argentina. Carriles, Bosch, and their associates also planned to bomb Cuban ships in Mexican ports. They actually helped to carry out bombings of a number of hotels in Cuba in 1997, one of which killed an Italian tourist, and were behind the September 21, 1976, car bombing in Washington, DC that killed former Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Letelier and his American assistant, Ronni Moffitt.

The role of the CIA in the Cubana 455 bombing is detailed in both the confession of Lugo to Dennis Randwar, the Trinidad and Tobago deputy police commissioner, and declassified U.S. Justice Department documents. For years, as governor of Florida and as a "private businessman" linked to CIA drug smuggling and money laundering, Jeb Bush, who arrived in Caracas in a year after the Cubana bombing for a two-year stint as a vice president for the CIA-linked Texas Commerce Bank, protected Posada Carriles and Bosch from answering for their acts of terrorism. During the Iran-contra scandal, Posada Carriles and Bosch assisted Vice President Bush's illegal contra supply operation in Central America.


Just as with the 9/11 attacks, for which there were prior warnings, the U.S. took no action to prevent a terrorist attack on a civilian airliner in 1976. And just as with 9/11, the Bush family was up to their eyeballs in both acts of aviation terrorism.


The above FBI memo indicates that the "IC" (U.S. Intelligence Community") was well aware that Posada Carriles and Bosch, both friends of Jeb Bush, "engineered the bombing of the airplane." Jeb Bush later defended both terrorists after they took up permanent residence in Miami.



FBI admits that it maintained contact with Posada Carriles as late as June 1976, well after he had been involved in carrying out terrorist bombings and began planning the bombing of Cubana 455.


Confession to the Trinidad and Tobago police by Ricardo Lozan, Posada Carriles's associate, that he was a member of the CIA. At the time, George H. W. Bush was CIA director and he would have undoubtedly authorized the bombing of Cubana 455.

As the U.S. continues to normalize its relations with Cuba, Posada Carriles, Jeb Bush, George H. W. Bush, and their murderous associates should be required to make an final accounting for their crimes, especially those of 1976, the year the CIA proved that it was never brought under control after the Watergate scandal. Rubio, the son of right-wing Cuban immigrants, has proven by his close and unapologetic association with the terrorist elements that largely make up Florida's Cuban exile community that he requisite "good citizen" credentials -- respect for the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, and a traditional appreciation for the popular "commonwealth" -- to serve as President of the United States, let alone a U.S. senator.

Cuba, Barbados, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, and Venezuela should also require the U.S. to pay full reparations for its repeated acts of terrorism and the costs involved in conducting official investigations of those heinous acts.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Major conflict-of-interest in Stanford case at SEC

WMR has learned from a source who was involved in the Enron scandal, offshore Panamanian brass plate operations that operated with te support of five banks -- Banco Nacional de Panama, TotalBank Panama, Banco Continental Panama, Global Bank Panama, and ABN-AMRO Bank -- and covert CIA Clinton era operations in Peru that supported Peruvian intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos -- code-named "The Doctor" by his CIA interlocutors, and Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori, both now imprisoned for human rights crimes, that the receiver appointed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to handle the distribution of the assets of Sir Allen Stanford's collapsed financial empire has, himself, been under an SEC investigation.

Ralph Janvey, the Dallas attorney appointed on February 17, 2009, by U.S. Judge David Godbey to act as the receiver for Stanford's assets, is a former assistant director of securities for the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency. Janvey told the Houston Chronicle that he is on the side of the investors in Stanford's failed enterprises, some of which were previously reported by WMR to be involved in laundering drug money for the CIA in Panama and Antigua. Interestingly, Janvey is being assisted in his receivership functions by the Houston-based law firm of Baker Botts, for which former Secretary of State James Baker is a major partner.

WMR has learned that Janvey has been under an investigation by the SEC's Inspector General and, as of January 15 of this year was still under investigation. Nevertheless, he was appointed as the receiver for Stanford a little over a month later. Janvey was also involved in a fraud case that centered on suspicious Panamanian financial operations that were being conducted during the Clinton administration under the watchful eye of then-U.S. ambassador to Panama Simon Ferro, who acted as a more-than-diplomatic liaison to then-Panamanian President Ernesto Perez Balladares, one of the co-founders of the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) and the inheritor of the private fortine of President Omar Torrijos, killed in a 1981 helicopter crash that ushered into power General Manuel Noriega and was blamed on the CIA. After leaving office, Balladares was accused of involvement in a scheme to smuggle Chinese illegal aliens into the United States and his U.S. visa was revoked.

To say that there is a troubling Panamanian link between the current investigation by the SEC and the Justice Department of Stanford, including his Panamanian operations, would be an understatement. Stanford was a major donor to the Democrats and Republicans and he was a guest at the Democratic National Convention in Denver that nominated Obama.

In July 1992, Pedro Miguel Gonzalez, the son of a PRD leader, was charged by Panamanian and U.S. authorities with the shooting death of U.S. Army Sergeant Zak Hernandez. The shooting took place on the eve of a visit by President George H. W. Bush to Panama to celebrate his invasion of the nation that saw the toppling of Noriega from power. Gonzalez was later acquitted of the charges by a Panamanian court. From 2007 to 2008, Gonzalez served as the President of the Panamanian National Assembly. The man who both Gonzalez turned to to get U.S. criminal charges drooped against him was none other than super-lawyer with the CIA-linked Williams & Connolly law firm, Greg Craig, the lawyer who represented Bill Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Craig is now Chief Counsel to President Barack Obama. Balladares also turned to a Washington lawyer to have his U.S. visa restored. The lawyer was also Craig. These connections were cited by Eric Jackson in The Panama News last year.

It is clear that under the Balladeres presidency and that of his successor, Mireya Moscoso, Stanford's operations flourished in Panama. Ferro went on to work for the law firm Greenberg Traurig, the same law firm where jailed GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff, an interlocutor for the Russian-Israeli Mafia, also worked. Stanford's home base of Antigua was also a known center of operations for the Russian-Israeli mob. Stanford was involved in private banking in Israel. WMR previously reported that Stanford Group served as a feeder fund for Madoff Securities and that much of Madoff's money was being siphoned off to Israeli bank accounts. In September 2006, Stanford committe to invest in Israel's Catalyst II fund, which invests primarily in bio/pharma, telecommunications, and computer software. Senior Stanford executives visited Israel in 2006 to hammer out the deal.

Ferro, a friend of Hillary Clinton's brother Hugh Rodham, also helped represent Luis Posada Carriles, the Cuban exile involved in the 1976 terrorist bombing of a Cubana airliner off of Barbados.

WMR has learned that Janvey represented a Texas oil businessman accused of running a Stanford-like Ponzi scheme. The businessman claims Janvey's law firm insisted that the attorney fees be paid by untraceable money orders. The businessman also claims that Janvey was representing him in an SEC case at the same time the lawyer was also working for the SEC. The word from Texas is that the SEC office in Fort Worth is "out of control."

Florida Senator Bill Nelson brought the matter to the attention of the SEC's Inspector General Stanley Kotz. WMR has been told that the SEC, now under the direction of Obama's SEC chairman, Mary Schapiro, former CEO of the securities industries self-regulator, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FIRA), is now backtracking in its investigation of Janvey's previous conflict-of-interest with the agency. Schapiro was originally appointed to the SEC by Ronald Reagan, re-appointed by George H. W. Bush, and named acting chairman by Clinton.

Note: It was this editor's meeting with a source in Alexandria on March 17 concerning Stanford's money laundering activities in Panama that ultimately led to my arrest after questioning Alexandria police why my source on Panamanian activities was being arrested. My trial is scheduled for 9:30 am, May 20, 2009, in the Alexandria General Court. It would now appear, based on the information received from Texas, that the Stanford case has a high-profile, one that reaches into the Obama White House and the office of chief counsel Greg Craig.

There is also a link to the lawsuit brought by Ecuadorian Amazonian Indians against Chevron Texaco for Texaco's pollution of their native lands. If Chevron Texaco is found liable, it will be forced to pay some $27 billion to the Indians. However, that will put a crimp in Chevron Texaco's plans to build a Meso-American natural gas and oil pipeline that will connect Colombian reserves to Central America and southern Mexico, with a possible extension to Texas. Chevron Texaco has lined up a group of Panamanian officials to facilitate the project, part of which may have been funded, according to our Latin American sources, by Stanford's banking operations in Panama and Colombia. Pending the outcome of the Ecuadorian lawsuit, the Meso-American pipeline project is currently on hold. Some of the information this editor was gathering in Alexandria on March 17 involved the Meso-America project and the Ecuadorian lawsuit against Chevron Texaco. Chevron Texaco's Panamanian political and financial operations are not only linked to White House Counsel Craig but the firm also has former Bill Clinton U.S. Trade Representative Mickey Kantor and Chief of Staff Mack McLarty and George H. W. Bush U.S. Trade Representative Carla Hills working on behalf of its interests.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Posada, the Exiles and the CIA Failed - Cuba Will Live By SAUL LANDAU

Posada, the Exiles and the CIA Failed

Cuba Will Live

By SAUL LANDAU

At a May 2 dinner in Miami hundreds of Cuban exiles, the vast majority of them in the Viagra generation, feted Luis Posada Carriles. This homage to the man suspected of masterminding the bombing of a Cuban commercial airliner that blew up over Barbados in October 1976 attracted a well known, aging radio personality. Tomas Garcia Fuste described Posada as "a real hero who has spent his life fighting for the freedom of Cuba." Fuste, who attended the dinner, said "Posada saw from the beginning that Fidel was a communist and began his heroic fight against him."

One of the dinner's organizers called Posada "a great Cuban ... a great patriot who has suffered a lot." Several of those interviewed denied Posada had authored the airplane sabotage that killed all 73 passengers and crew members, even though the actual perpetrators of the bombing identified him to police. Other evidence pointed directly to Posada. His adorers also discounted facts showing he had orchestrated bombings of Cuban tourist centers in the late 1990s. One tourist died; scores of others suffered injuries. Posada lovers in Miami blamed the Cuban government for destroying its own airplane "to create martyrs" and "staging" the tourist bombings "to get sympathy."

If Posada didn't plan these events, does he deserve the "combatiente legendario" honor only for his failed assassination plots against Fidel?

Posada and the crowd of retired lawyers, businessmen and professionals in Miami spoke of fighting to restore freedom to Cuba. Did no one recall that Posada worked as a Batista police agent? Had the crowd at the Posada fete forgotten that Batista staged a coup to grab the presidency in 1952? That his repressive forces killed 20,000 until the revolutionaries overthrew them? Posada's vision of a good society means returning to the good old Batista days –without internal turmoil. What a gap between their perspective and the Cuba that exists 90 miles from the Florida coast!

After fifty years, aspirations of those who still want to recover their property, perks and privileges grow ever dimmer. Posada, slurring his words badly as a result of damage done by a gunman who shot him in the face fifteen years ago, said: "We are coming to the end of a terrible stage. The end of our struggle is near." Applause! -Since the 1991 Soviet collapse, Cubans have lived through a "special period," the euphemism that meant drastic decline in living standards. Cuba lost its annual Soviet aid of billions of rubles and its advantageous trade with Soviet bloc nations. The state had to break its part of the social contract: it could no longer provide Cubans with sufficient food and clothing. Even the fabled health care and education deteriorated. Rations were reduced and most Cubans experienced a social morph from communism (sharing) to individualism (dog eat dog) – for survival.

Seventeen years of "special period" cost the revolution. Despite signs of recovery, however, spurred by foreign investment, the soaring price of nickel and the discovery of oil deposits, thousands of Cubans – mostly young people -- continue to leave their island in rafts or smugglers' boats to seek more opportunity in Florida. Engineers, scientists and PhDs in literature choose not to spend their work lives making pizzas or paper boxes, or teaching grade school.

By 2007, Cuban leaders began to address some problems developed in the post-Soviet period. The leadership, however, had no intention of going into the Chinese or Vietnamese models. On July 26, 2007, Raul Castro spoke of solving pressing issues like daily adversity, shortage of food and low agricultural productivity, within a socialist model.

The government has responded to popular discontent, alienation, and downright cynicism and over the last two years imported 35% more food. Raul also admitted that "wages are clearly insufficient to meet people's needs." This statement does not mean what U.S. journalists report or sneer at when they report that the average Cuban wage comes to $20 a month. They don't factor in free health care and education from nursery school to PhD; no rent or taxes; practically free transportation, entertainment, and subsidized food. But it is still a long way from the cradle-to grave security Cubans experienced before the Soviet demise.

Allowing more goods for sale will not mean a mass rush of sales because most Cubans do not possess excess foreign cash. Cubans will have to choose between the new items available – including stays at posh hotels. Cubans who receive remittances from family members abroad or get paid in hard currency continue to enjoy buying privileges – institutionalized inequality – that grate at much of the population. But freedom to shop cannot sustain a socialist country – especially a third world nation built on the twin themes of justice and equality.

The new mood has extended to artists and intellectuals who declared they would not tolerate censorship. The leadership agreed. But ending censorship does not relate to several thousand Cubans fleeing the island monthly for Florida. They don't leave because of censorship, but for freedom to practice their professions and earn a better living.

Fidel Castro warned Cubans they could lose their own revolution. In his April 3, 2008 letter to Artists and Writers Union President Miguel Barnet, Castro wrote: "Everything that ethically fortifies the Revolution is good; everything that weakens it is bad." In 1961 he told Cuba's intellectuals: "Inside the revolution, everything; outside the revolution; nothing." If one agreed and sympathizes, one also winced when Cuban leaders acted in ways that seemed to contradict this statement.

"The Cuban revolution was born to be different," the Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano once wrote "Assailed by the incessant hounding from the empire to the north, it survived as it could and not as it wished. The people, valiant and generous, sacrificed a great deal to stay on their feet in a world of rampant servility. But as year after year of trials buffeted the island, the revolution began to lose the spontaneity and freshness that marked its beginning."New Internationalist July 2003

No kidding. In 1960, I watched creative chaos dominate everyday life. Like Galeano, I have seen, over 48 years, "revolutionary virtue" turned into "obedience to orders from above." Loss of initiative is an ironic result of almost fifty years of US punishing Cuba for disobedience. Washington blocked "the development of democracy in Cuba, feeding the militarization of power and providing alibis for bureaucratic rigidity," Galeano continued. "The revolution which was capable of surviving the fury of 10 American presidents and 20 CIA directors needs the energy that comes from participation and diversity to face the dark times that surely lie ahead. I say with sadness: Cuba hurts."

Cuba resisted 638 assassination attempts against Fidel. The CIA says this is slightly exaggerated, but it admits launching thousands of attacks against Cuba. For half a century, the United States maintained a blockade, alongside psychological and possibly biological and chemical warfare, survived and got wounded in the process. In March 2008, however, a change began. Beyond offering freedom to buy electronic appliances and cell phones and own their own houses free and clear, Cuban leaders signed the UN covenants on civil and political rights, which means that unions cannot be part of government and free speech, press, and politics must be respected.

A citizen told Vice President Carlos Lage at a conference that the government lacked sensitivity to people's social needs and psychological problems, stuff money can't fix. Lage apologized. Cubans watched it on TV. Earlier this year, in Juventud Rebelde, an official newspaper, the government was ripped for fudging statistics on unemployment. Changes have begun, but the smugglers remain. The boats remain full as well.

The Cuban revolution succeeded. It achieved independence and sovereignty, educated and made healthy its population, provided them with basic needs and educated its people to dance on the stage of world history. Cubans altered the destiny of southern Africa when its troops helped defeat the apartheid South African armies at Cuito Cuanavale in 1987-8. Mandela hugged Fidel at his inauguration. "You made this possible," he said for the world to hear. Cubans played a vital role in helping Angola maintain her independence and for Namibia to get hers. They played roles in the Vietnam War, the Yom Kippur war, and led the charge to slay the Monroe Doctrine.

Fifty years ago, Washington controlled Latin America; not one leader dared challenge its hegemony or its economic policies. Today, four of Fidel's ideological sons run countries (Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Nicaragua) and several of his cousins direct others (Brazil, Chile, Argentina, and Panama).

Cuban doctors and scientists, artists and dancers, writers and filmmakers have etched their names in the honor rolls of countless countries through their sterling performances. The Cuban revolution created them. Although Cuban doctors continue to save eyesight throughout the third world and perform other humanitarian tasks, the question now is: can Cuba overcome the legacy of the special period, when individualism eroded the collective spirit, and can she transcend the three decades of the Soviet model that she had to adopt for survival? Her leaders have lived for the revolution and imparted its values to the population. Can Cubans respond and grab the initiative to maintain the enormous gains or succumb to the shiny lure of mass consumerism?

No matter what happens, Luis Posada "el combatiente legendario" will not return to Cuba as one of its new rulers, gracias a Dios!

Saul Landau received the Bernardo O'Higgins award from Chile. He is a fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies and author of A Bush and Botox World (AK/CounterPunch).

Sunday, June 17, 2007

FABIAN ESCALANTE, EX-CHIEF OF CUBAN INTELLIGENCE: Posada knows too much

BY JEAN-GUY ALLARD—Granma International staff writer—

“POSADA is a killer, an assassin who kills without any emotion whatsoever, but he does know too much and constitutes a real danger for those who used him for more than 40 years,” commented Fabian Escalante, former chief of the Cuban intelligence services, recalling in an interview with Granma International the terrorist offensive of 1976, in the midst of which Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles masterminded the explosion in full flight of a Cubana Aviación DC-10.

After heading the Cuban counterintelligence services, Escalante was appointed chief of the State Security Department, precisely in January of that fateful year of 1976 when Bosch and Posada executed the series of attacks that culminated in the assassination in Washington of the former Chilean foreign minister, Orlando Letelier and the destruction of the Cuban passenger plane that left 73 people dead.

On that subject, Escalante related some unknown facts of that period. “By chance, and that came out later, at the same time as Bosch and various of his accomplices arrived in Santiago in December 1974 to place themselves at Pinochet’s disposition and become his paid terrorists, the Cuban security services began an important operation against the CIA in various Latin American countries, in search of information related to these activities, known to be underway.

“Bosch was going to offer himself to Pinochet along with this group of terrorists of Cuban origin who would become killers within Operation Condor. He met up with General Manuel Contreras, made contact with the U.S. agent Michael Townley and, a few months later, organized the kidnapping of two Cuban officials in Argentina, who were brutally murdered.

“The Security services organized an operation to discover what the terrorist plans being prepared were. Of course, we didn’t know of the existence of Operation Condor, but we already knew its instruments. I reiterate that we had no idea of its dimensions, but we did know of the danger and resources that the main organizers had at their disposal.

“Moreover, I reiterate, we did have significant information via the penetration that we had achieved within the CIA structures that a subversive mechanism, at that time called ‘autonomous operations,’ had been activated.”

GENESIS OF THE TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS

The concept of autonomous organization was coined in 1963 and was approved by Attorney General Robert Kennedy, Escalante recalled.

“Basically, this concept established that the CIA was creating organizations of Cuban counterrevolutionaries to operate outside of U.S. territory. The CIA assigned them case officers to attend to them, fix their objectives for actions, subsidize them in terms of money and war materials and¼ discovered the result of their actions in the newspapers.

“And, precisely then, in 1974, we found out that these organizations had been reactivated, that operational concept which developed into the genesis of the terrorist organizations.

Did you know about Bosch’s stay in Chile?

We didn’t know that Bosch was in Santiago de Chile. We didn’t know that. But we did know that these groups where Bosch was, with Alvin Ross, the Guillermo and Ignacio Novo Sampoll brothers; with Luis Posada Carriles and Ricardo ‘El Mono’ Morales Navarrete in Venezuela; Antonio Veciana Blanch in Bolivia, were being prepared to unleash an operation against Cuba. An operation that, in 1976, Orlando Bosch himself called ‘the war around the world.’

We had information and we were working on that. But we didn’t have all the information and the details.

Unfortunately it wasn’t possible to discover the plans as a whole. They were highly secret plans. But even so, we began to prepare and activate all the agents infiltrated into the CIA networks to seek out this information.

Paradoxically, on the same date that Bosch was embarking on his activities in Santiago de Chile, selecting his collaborators and safe houses to place them at the service of the Condor mechanism, at that very moment, very close to them, the Cuban services initiated their penetration of the CIA networks which, in the end, made it possible to dismantle some of the conspiracies planned.

I remember that one byproduct of that operation was the exposé and unmasking of the then CIA station head in Lima, Peru, which was an important operative base for the agency in the region. As a result of these actions, the CIA had no alternative but to withdraw it and locate it in another country.

By 1975 we had achieved a significant penetration and I am referring to the CIA networks directed to working against Cuba and a number of the terrorist groups acting against our homeland from Miami, where they had had a powerful operational base up until 1969.

In those years there was intense fighting in the shadows. Information is obtained to act upon. There were a series of plans that were dismantled and others that regrettably were not. I am referring to placing bombs in aircraft, attempts on the lives of officials and diplomats working abroad, terrorist attacks on companies trading with Cuba in various countries of the region.

To what point did you manage to locate each of the many groups active at that time?

We were searching on many fronts at the same time, in many countries. Those people moved around a lot; they were in Mexico, in Central America, in Venezuela, where Posada Carriles was virtually deputy chief of the DISIP (Venezuelan Intelligence Police) and Ricardo Morales Navarrete was chief of the Counterintelligence Department. They had a strong base there.

They were also in Bolivia, where Antonio Veciana Blanch was. They had created structures – with the assassination of Che; that is to say at the end of the 60s and beginning of the 70s – and moreover, drug trafficking networks, because the common trait of all these people is that in addition to their actions against Cuba, they are linked to the whole business of drug trafficking, of contraband. That was their way of making more money. It has to be said that the war on Cuba, the country where they were born, became for them a way of making money, lots of money.

Information that emerged from investigations by the U.S. Congress on CIA conspiracies to assassinate Fidel, reveals that Antonio Veciana received a payment of $360,000 from his CIA case officer in 1976. Why that payment, when one would suppose that all the operations in which he took part were punctually funded? Is it because they were trying to buy his silence on an extremely delicate matter?

What other million-dollar sums have been paid to Bosch, Posada and their other associates in all these years of terror? And the Cuban-American National Foundation hadn’t yet been created.

And then 76 arrived, with its succession of attacks. How did you confront those events?

The year of 76 was a very hard year for us. We prepared ourselves, dismantled a good number of these terrorist projects. There were frustrated actions, known in advance by the Cuban Intelligence Services and which thus remained unknown. However, regrettably, there were many others, those known publicly, that we couldn’t dismantle and all those terrorist actions of 76 were going to culminate in the explosion of the Cuban passenger plane.

In that year the wave of terror carefully planned by the CIA – at that time directed by George Bush Senior, was unleashed. Pinochet ordered the assassination of Generals Prats of Chile and Juan José Torres of Bolivia; the Cuban embassy in Lisbon was blown up; a number of Cuban diplomats and officials were killed in countries in the region; former Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Letelier’s car was blown up right in the middle of Washington; and finally, a Cuban civilian aircraft was brought down in full flight by two bombs. These are plots that these people were carrying out as part of Operation Condor.

What was known in Cuba at that time about Luis Posada Carriles?

In ‘76, we had very fragmented information on Posada. Orlando Bosch , Antonio Veciana, the Novo Sampoll brothers, Nazario Sargén, Jorge Mas Canosa and many other organization leaders were the ones who were planning and had contact with the CIA and thus gave us the opportunity of directly discovering when and where they planned to act and, for that reason, were among the priorities then.

Posada was never the leader of anything. Posada is a hired assassin, a paid terrorist. He is a killer, an assassin like those in U.S. movies, who would murder anymore without a trace of emotion, just for money, out of self-interest.

But he is a very, very dangerous witness.

I remember that in 1971 information emerged in relation to a conspiracy to assassinate Fidel during his visit to Chile in which Posada was involved. Afterwards, years later, the details came out. The conspiracy was really diabolical. Its first phase consisted of using a film camera to conceal a revolver with which two of Posada’s henchmen, accredited as Venezuelan journalists, were to shoot the Cuban leader during his initial press conference on reaching Santiago de Chile. To that end, Antonio Veciana and his Alpha 66 group had smuggled in arms and explosives to have available other options of assassinating the Commander in Chief, in the event of the first attempt failing.

A Plan B was carefully prepared by Posada Carriles, then chief of operations of the Venezuelan political police. As it happened, a correspondent of the Soviet TASS news agency who was also a KGB officer was in Caracas. Posada arranged things to photograph his two agents while they were talking with the Russian, so that after the assassination of the Comandante, a media campaign would be unleashed showing the photos and accusing the Soviets of being the perpetrators of the crime, given the “existing political contradictions.” Posada and Veciana had fixed things with Eduardo Sepúlveda, colonel of the Chilean Mounted Police, responsible for security in the location where Fidel would give his press conference, so that instead of detaining the assassins, he would eliminate them and thus avert any indiscretion.

Where were you when the Cubana passenger plane exploded?

I was on an official visit to the USSR. That was a terrible day. With the time difference, I heard about it late at night on the 6th (October) or in the early hours of the next day. There were two or three of us Cubans there together¼ it was a terrible night because we realized that we had not done everything that we should have done. My impression was¼ of much pain, a feeling of great impotence. I returned immediately.

Our government immediately sent a team of technicians and investigators to Barbados. Within a few days, thanks to the investigations made and the statements of Hernán Ricardo and Freddy Lugo, caught in Trinidad and Tobago, we discovered almost all the details, and the masterminds, Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada.

Recently declassified documents demonstrate that the CIA, the FBI and the U.S. embassy in Venezuela knew about it¼ And nobody did anything at all to avert that monstrous crime.

Did you penetrate the CORU at any point?

The CORU no, but the organizations comprising it, yes. Sometimes I have thought that if the Cuban services had available to them the ultramodern communications equipment that the CIA had then, more conspiracies would definitely have been avoided. In that period, they were working with so-called rapid fire communications equipment, which transmitted messages in 15 to 16 seconds. Speed of communications was the main problem that we had: gathering information and bringing it in for analysis. Because information is valuable when you can compare it with other information, when it is analyzed and meditated upon.

In those years, information took many days to arrive. I remember the case of an informant who, with important information in his hands, stole a speedboat in Miami and came here to Cuba to deliver it. At that time, correspondence both into and out of Cuba had to go through a center that the CIA had set up in Mexico City, where it was carefully revised.

From the end of ‘76, in ‘77 and in ‘78, these acts of terrorism gradually disappeared as a result of the actions of the Cuban Intelligence and Counterintelligence Services and the important – I would say decisive – political measures taken in terms of Cuban emigration which, as it turned out, became a neutralizing element of the first order.

What happened with the CIA and its autonomous organizations?

In the end I think they got out of control. The case of Bin Laden is one example. There is an interesting book by U.S. writer David Wise, The Invisible Government, on that theme. Organizations like the CIA or Mossad in Israel, and others in other regions of the world have acquired unlimited power, because they have information on their own presidents that they can manipulate or dress up and moreover, they have the capacity to act without controls to obtain secret results. Remember the Iran-Contra scandal where the U.S. Security Council was involved in a huge drug trafficking operation to fund the dirty war against Sandinista Nicaragua.

Just imagine, the Central Intelligence Agency in the 60s, with bases spread throughout the world, handling operations as delicate as the U-2 spy planes with ultramodern radars, with a large operations base in Miami with a $100-million budget (equivalent to $1 billion now) with 55 phantom enterprises that were producing uncontrolled profits. Where did all that money that produced the war on Cuba go?

There’s a fabulous U.S. film from the ‘70s called precisely Three Days of the Condor, with Robert Redford, which relates how a CIA unit dedicated to studying detective novels for errors or poor interpretation, comes across an ultra-secret covert operation in progress. The decision taken by the bosses is to eliminate all the employees, who are nothing more than novel readers and a number of characters attack the house where the unit is located and liquidate everyone, minus Redford, who had gone out to get food. That’s where the film starts, with Redford fleeing and pursued by all his bosses. The anecdote reflects how far things can get in that dark and shady underworld.

Isn’t that what happened to Posada in Guatemala?

I think drug trafficking was an issue there. Because, remember, Posada “escaped” in 85 from a Venezuelan prison and was received in El Salvador by Félix Rodríguez Mendigutía, who made him CIA operations chief at Ilopango airport and responsible for the supply flights for the Nicaraguan Contras.

At that time, there was a man in Honduras, Mario Delamico of Cuban origin, closely linked to the CIA and the Honduran army, who was in contact with other mercenaries including a number of Cubans located in Costa Rica. They had various enterprises and were to take charge of receiving and distributing the flights loaded with arms sent by Posada and sending back Colombian drugs on the same planes for transportation to the United States.

This was the business handled by Luis Posada Carriles, directly subordinated to Félix Rodríguez, the assassin of Comandante Ernesto Guevara.

I don’t know what happened in Guatemala. But after the capture in Nicaraguan territory of the U.S. pilot Eugenio Hassenfus, when he was dropping weapons to the Contras, Posada had to dismantle his camp in El Salvador.

What he did afterwards, one would have to ask him, but I, for one, don’t know. It is said that when he went to Guatemala City, some hired killers – probably around drugs – wanted to kill him. That’s all the information we have. But now I ask myself: What money would he have been left with? What could he have done? Who would he have wanted to get out of the way?

What are your thoughts on the legal proceedings against Posada Carriles since his arrival in the United States? Where is all that going?

Well¼ to an official pardon. There’s not the slightest doubt of that. There is something underlying this, not only the case of Luis Posada Carriles. but all the current U.S. policy and it is its brutality and prepotency.

Before they were more professional, more skilful. Before there were more intelligent people. If there’s one thing I’m sure about, it is that this lot today are not intelligent.

Before there was a Robert Kennedy and a Richard Helms who thought up the autonomous operations to remove the mess from American soil and validate the U.S. doctrine of plausible negotiation. In other words, always having the elements to deny U.S. participation in a specific event.

Nowadays, these people are more ignorant, as ignorant as the U.S. president himself. It was evident that the United States couldn’t allow Posada to be tried.

First there was the situation in Panama, where they no alternative but to try him, because he was caught red-handed. And it became obvious that when Mireya Moscoso left power that she would pardon him because she was part of all that. She was a U.S. agent.

Then he went to ground in El Salvador, was in Yucatan and entered the United States on the orders of his bosses. Posada would never have done that without an express order. His handlers told him: ‘come over here, we’re doing to do the same for you as we did with Orlando Bosch.’

But they didn’t take into account the action of people in solidarity, of independent journalism and then came the condemnations and things became evident. The pressure by Cuba has been very decisive, so decisive that they probably wouldn’t have done what they had to do without the Cuban exposé, the combative marches, the roundtables, the open tribunals, international solidarity, all of which, in my view, are pressure mechanisms that have been essential in terms of forcing the United States to do everything that it has done, attempting to have Posada go on trial as an illegal immigrant.

But they have assured that they are still investigating the case Thomas Shannon, assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere Affairs, has just affirmed that That’s a fact, isn’t it?

All of that is a lie. A white lie to satisfy some “democrats,” for whom there has been no other remedy than to condemn Posada’s release and who need an argument to be able to say: “you see, the United States is going to do something.” No, the United States is not going to do anything at all.

Luis Posada Carriles could die at any time. I repeat: he will always be a very dangerous witness. And he knows too much.

==========================================

"IN TIMES OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT, TELLING THE TRUTH WILL BE A REVOLUTIONARY ACT." - George Orwell

“If the world is upside down the way it is now, wouldn’t we have to turn it over to get it to stand up straight?” - Eduardo Galeano

A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. -- Edward R. Murrow

Friday, June 08, 2007

¡Cuidado Miami, hay terroristas sueltos!

por Angel Rodríguez Alvarez *, AIN *

Como nunca antes esta voz de alerta es tan necesaria y oportuna para la mayoritaria población pacífica de Miami, sus aeropuertos, medios de prensa independientes, sedes diplomáticas y agencias de viajes a Cuba, entre otros.

_______________________________________________

Y es que esa urbe principal de la Florida, caracterizada como sede preferida desde hace más de 48 años de una mafia inescrupulosa y agresiva, ha completado ahora el equipo de dirección de operaciones violentas, con la llegada de uno de sus más experimentados ejecutores.

Con la plácida instalación en la ciudad de Luis Posada Carriles, ya Orlando Bosch Avila tiene con quien intercambiar ideas, elaborar planes y trasmitir experiencias acerca de lo que les enseñó la CIA para preservar valores y defender la democracia.

Para quienes hayan escuchado o leído declaraciones presentando a Posada y Bosch como dos " viejitos indefensos ", cuya única aspiración es vivir tranquilamente en retiro, resulta necesario recordarles la firme decisión expresada por ambos de continuar ejerciendo su vieja y lucrativa profesión de promotores dinamiteros.

Bosch ha declarado a la televisión miamense, más de una vez, y con no disimulada energía, su deseo de continuar haciendo estallar aviones, embarcaciones y autos, siempre que suponga viajen en ellos" comunistas".

Se trata de un fanático fascista cargado de odio visceral, con un desprecio absoluto por la vida de quienes catalogue como adversarios. Así de sencillo es el asunto para este sujeto con una larga historia criminal no totalmente conocida.

En Bosch la concepción de quiénes son enemigos es tan abarcadora que incluye la raza, evidenciada en una de las entrevistas del canal 41, cuando justificó el derribo del avión cubano con 73 personas a bordo pues, "en definitiva, chico, los que iban allí eran cinco negritas".

Posada, aunque menos locuaz y alardoso, tampoco está dispuesto a ceder su liderazgo criminal como alumno aventajado en explosivos de la CIA y experimentado reclutador de mercenarios.

Imposible constituye olvidar las decenas de páginas de su libro de memorias, llenas de jactanciosos relatos sobre los servicios brindados durante años a esa Agencia y a las organizaciones contrarrevolucionarias del llamado exilio anticastrista.

Como una caracterización magistral de la catadura criminal de este sujeto es la entrevista concedida a la periodista Ana Louise Bardach, del The New York Times.

Interrogado acerca de la cadena de atentados dinamiteros ejecutados contra instalaciones turísticas en La Habana en 1997, en uno de los cuales perdió la vida un joven italiano, la respuesta de Posada quedará como un ejemplo de frío y bien calculado cinismo.

Su tranquila respuesta fue que estaba "en el lugar equivocado y en el momento equivocado", al parecer suficiente razón para merecer su trágico final. Ante la pregunta de cómo se sentía después de causar tanto luto y dolor, aseguró concluyente: "duermo como un bebé".

A las "cualidades" descritas de ambos debe añadirse que debido a tales "proezas" cuentan con la protección de la Casa Blanca, el respaldo financiero de los grupos mafiosos y el reconocimiento social más elevado de la mayoría de los medios de prensa floridanos.

Con tales estímulos no resulta difícil comprender la urgente necesidad de lanzar a los cuatro vientos el alerta que da título a este comentario.

Angel Rodríguez Alvarez

Saturday, May 19, 2007

Terrorist Luis Posada Carriles - Double Standard in the U.S. War on Terror

By: Venezuela Information Office

Luis Posada Carriles is one of Latin America's most notorious criminals, a terrorist protected by the U.S. and allowed to live freely within its borders. Recruited by the CIA in 1962, Posada has since carried out deadly bombings and other crimes against humanity.

The Deadliest Terrorist Attack before 9/11
In 1976, the Cuban-born Venezuelan citizen blew up an airliner, killing all 73 passengers aboard, including 24 teenage members of Cuba's champion fencing team and 11 Guyanese medical students. Until 9/11, this was the deadliest attack on an airplane ever to occur in the Western Hemisphere. Posada was arrested in Venezuela and charged with masterminding the attack. However, he escaped from prison in 1985 and resumed coordinating terrorist acts throughout the region. In 1997, Posada was linked to several bombings in Havana hotels that left an Italian tourist dead and several injured. In 2000, he was arrested in Panama for attempting to kill Cuban President Fidel Castro using C-4 explosives in a school auditorium. Each time, Posada evaded those seeking to bring him to justice.

Extradition Requests Ignored
In March 2005, Posada entered the U.S. illegally. He was allowed to languish in a luxurious Miami apartment, emboldened by the fact that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had not detained him. In May of 2005, Venezuela formally requested his extradition from the U.S. so that he could be tried for 73 counts of murder in the 1976 bombing. The U.S. has yet to honor the extradition request or even respond to it. Only after bragging to the Miami press that the DHS was not looking for him, Posada was detained by DHS officials who neglected even to handcuff him as they took him away.

The Immigration, Customs and Enforcement Agency (ICE) quickly stated that it would not deport Posada to Cuba or “a country acting on behalf of Cuba”. By doing so, ICE set a precedent that indicated the U.S. government’s lenient stance on Posada even before his immigration case had begun. Despite Venezuela's repeated requests that the U.S. detain Posada for extradition purposes, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has yet to act. On June 15, 2005, Venezuela filed a formal extradition request with the State Department, providing voluminous documentary evidence of Posada's crimes. The State Department referred the case to the DOJ, which failed to bring it to court as required by law.

Protected by the U.S.
By flaunting extradition treaties, the U.S. has chosen to treat Posada Carriles’ case as a minor immigration offense, charging him only with illegal entry into the country. Posada brought a single witness to testify in that case, his long time lawyer and associate Joaquín Chaffardet, who was never cross-examined nor questioned about his own links to Posada and terrorist activities. Instead, Chaffardet was allowed to testify as an objective expert on Venezuela's human rights record. The DHS submitted no evidence against Posada, indicating to the defense and to the Judge that the U.S. government would prefer he be granted Convention Against Torture relief. However, no evidence exists to support claims that he would be tortured in Venezuela.

22 months have passed since Venezuela's first extradition request, and the U.S. has failed to present Posada's case to a federal court, despite treaty obligations that require it to do so. Though a U.S. ICE officer admits that Posada has a "long history of criminal activity and violence in which innocent civilians were killed," the Justice Department has not charged him with the 1976 attack. This is despite the binding obligations of a 1971 international convention to which the U.S. is a party. Nor has Posada been classified as a terrorist, which the Patriot Act allows. Indeed, the 79-year-old terrorist has never been charged by U.S. justice officials with participating in a violent act.

Posada Freed by U.S. Courts
On May 9, 2007, immigration charges brought against Posada were overturned by Texas District Judge Kathleen Cardone, leaving a man branded by the U.S. DOJ as "a dangerous criminal and an admitted mastermind of terrorist plots" free to roam a country he entered illegally and from which another court has ordered him to be deported. There is no explanation for having a high profile case that deals with a known-terrorist be ruled as an immigration matter, when it clearly should be oversee by the highest levels of government. “In addition to engaging in fraud, deceit and trickery, this Court finds the Government's tactics in this case are so grossly shocking and so outrageous as to violate the universal sense of justice. As a result, this Court is left with no choice but to dismiss the indictment," Judge Cardone wrote in her scathing opinion.

As international condemnation mounts against the U.S.' failure to prosecute an admitted terrorist, congressional leaders have demanded to know why U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales never declared Posada a security threat nor jailed him under the Patriot Act. Congressman William Delahunt (D-MA) stated in a letter to Gonzales that "Mr. Posada's release from prison calls into question our commitment to combating terrorism and raises concerns about a double standard in our treatment of terrorists." Delahunt is launching an investigation into Posada's relationship with the U.S. government as well as the failure of the Bush administration to designate Posada a terrorist. A former prosecutor himself, Rep. Delahunt called Judge Cardone's critique of the government's handling of the case unprecedented. Interestingly, Cardone threw out transcripts containing incriminating evidence against Posada on the grounds that an interpreter hired by the U.S. government was unreliable.

A Double Standard in the War on Terror
By refusing to extradite or prosecute Posada, the U.S. demonstrates contradictions in its war on terror. While claiming to lead a global offensive against terrorism using measures such as foreign intervention and the restriction of civil liberties at home, the U.S. also continues to recruit, tolerate, and protect terrorists within its own borders. A consistent hesitance to bring Posada to justice – and, more broadly, to allow political loyalties to define who is a terrorist, regardless of criminal records – confirms this fact.

Venezuela’s Ambassador to the White House, Bernardo Alvarez, recently confirmed the same: “While relations between Venezuela and the U.S. have been strained, nothing should prevent the U.S. government from either extraditing Posada to Venezuela or prosecuting him for the 1976 bombing. Posada’s violent attack could not be justified then; much less should it be overlooked now. Should Posada be allowed to escape justice for his vicious crimes, it will send a powerful message to the international community that some terrorism is acceptable. It isn’t.”

Cuba asks UN to circulate official protest on Posada’s release

CUBA has asked the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council to circulate, as an official document among their members, a statement protesting the release in the United States of international terrorist Luis Posada Carriles.

In a letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, Cuban Ambassador Rodrigo Malmierca affirms that “an authority of the United States justice system dismissed, on May 8, all charges brought against that terrorist and freed him.”

Cuba holds the U.S. government responsible for that ruling, which is further evidence of the double standard applied by that country in its so-called “war on terrorism,” states the letter, summed up by Prensa Latina.

It adds that the decision to not classify this individual as a terrorist is not only a violation of U.S. law by the U.S. government itself, it also clearly fails to comply with commitments made via international agreements and treaties.

Malmierca reiterated that freeing Posada Carriles is a violation of pertinent resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council.

The Cuban ambassador issued his most energetic condemnation of this latest maneuver, which he described as an insult to the Cuban people, and the victims and family members of the detestable terrorist act against a Cuban civilian airliner, which killed 73 innocent people.

He expressly requested the secretary-general to circulate that letter and its appendix with the statement by the Revolutionary Government of the Republic of Cuba, dated May 9, 2007, as an official document of the General Assembly’s 61st Session.

The circulation of the document is in accordance with items 66, 80 and 100 of the current session period.

Those items deal with, respectively, the right of nations to self-determination, the rule of law nationally and internationally and measures to eliminate international terrorism.

Malmierca also requested for Havana’s statement to be circulated as an official document.

Translated by Granma International

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

CubanaBomber Death Watch: You have a right to be informed!

From Aporrea, we have this little item on just how far the Bush Crime Family is willing to go to conceal the evidence of its misdeeds:

The Venezuelan documentary, "Posada Carriles: Terrorism Made in USA", which tells the history of this terrorist and his connection to the CIA, has been confiscated by US security services at the airport of Miami. The film, in DVD format, was found in a parcel of mail from Caracas, bound for El Paso, Texas, where a social organization was to receive it today, Friday, May 11, to be shown as part of a program of activities there against the release of the terrorist Posada Carriles.

The film is now in the hands of the Bush government, and the US mail services report that it will be "held for inspection". This occurred yesterday (Thursday) at 1:30, and the film is being held in custody, which is to say that the showing slated for today will be suspended, as the documentary will not arrive on time. The only information we received from Miami Airport is that the inspection "will take 8 days or more".

Is the White House so desperate in the case of Posada Carriles that it would order its agents at the airport to confiscate a DVD? Why is the Bush government "inspecting" this documentary? Eight days to "inspect" a 90-minute film? Do they suspect that the DVD is concealing some kind of WMD? Will the DVD pass the lie-detector test in an interrogation? Will it be re-edited? Or will they send it to terrorist groups in Miami so that they include us on their hit list? Is this some kind of test of the limits of people's patience for absurdity, since BushCo chose to liberate the terrorist Posada Carriles, but take into custody the documentary "Posada Carriles"?

It's clear the Bush is an imperialist clown, but that bad??? It's clear that he's afraid of history, but to the extent of confiscating a documentary???

Today, in El Paso, the CENSORSHIP of the Bush government kept the North American public from viewing a historical documentary on the terrorist Posada Carriles, but whatever way this documentary will reach its destination, it will reach it. Take that, Bush. The motto of the entrance to your CIA reads "The truth shall set you free", and the truth is the patrimony of the people and will not be confiscated at any airport, nor stopped by censorship.

There are hundreds of voices of torture victims and relatives calling for justice, and thousands of declassified documents giving testimony to the crimes of Posada Carriles as a CIA agent, and there is much evidence of the involvement of Bush with these and other terrorists of that calibre. Every day more voices join the protest, because it is not just an extradition order from the government of Venezuela, it is the yearning of a people fed up with the abuse of power and offences against human rights. These voices, these pieces of evidence, this clamor for justice and against terrorism, will not be silenced by censorship nor by the manipulations of the White House, because it is a global clamor.

PRISON FOR THE TERRORIST POSADA CARRILES!
NO MORE SUPPORT FROM BUSH FOR MIAMI TERRORIST GROUPS!
LET THE TRUTH BE KNOWN ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF BUSH-POSADA-CIA!
FREE THE CUBAN FIVE!
NO TO TERRORISM!
DOWN WITH CENSORSHIP!

They Hate Us For Our Hypocrisy By Eugene Robinson

The Bush administration says that its zero-tolerance policy against terrorism applies to all suspected evildoers, not just Muslims, and that its zero-tolerance policy against Cuba is a principled position, not just an exercise in pandering to the implacable anti-Castro exiles in Miami. On both counts, evidence suggests otherwise.

The fact is that Luis Posada Carriles, an accused terrorist who entered the United States illegally and was taken into custody by authorities, is not being kept in solitary confinement and dragged out for occasional waterboarding. As of this writing, he is a free man.

Posada, 79, has a long history of violent opposition to Fidel Castro’s regime. He was accused of masterminding the 1976 midair bombing of a civilian Cuban airliner, a terrorist act that killed 73 innocent people. He is also suspected of involvement in a 1997 series of bombings of Havana hotels and nightclubs; several people were injured and an Italian tourist was killed.

Terrorism, our government constantly reminds us, is the scourge of our times. So why is a man described by our government as “an unrepentant criminal and admitted mastermind of terrorist plots and attacks on tourist sites” looking forward to a hero’s welcome in Miami from his old Bay of Pigs comrades?

Posada sneaked into the country in 2005, and had the temerity to advertise his presence by giving a news conference. After some dithering, Homeland Security officials took him into custody. He was indicted in January on federal charges of immigration fraud for lying about how he entered the United States.

On Tuesday, in El Paso, Texas—where Posada had been held—U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone dismissed the indictment against Posada, saying the government had resorted to unconstitutional “trickery” in gathering its evidence against him. It was Cardone’s dismissal order that set Posada free.

Cardone found that in Posada’s formal immigration interview after the feds whisked him away in 2005, the government failed to provide adequate translation of the questions and answers. What the government contended were lies about how Posada had made his way into the United States looked more like misunderstandings, Cardone concluded.

It’s worth pointing out that this isn’t the first time Posada has used his allegedly poor command of English as an excuse: He claims he didn’t understand what he was saying years ago when he boasted to a reporter of his role in the Havana bombings.

So, was the judge snookered into letting a hardened terrorist walk on a technicality? Not really. It’s more the case that the judge refused to play along.

Cardone’s point was that if the government really wanted to keep Posada behind bars because he was a career terrorist, then prosecutors should have prosecuted him as a terrorist. Then, faster than you can say “Patriot Act,” authorities could have made him disappear into the netherworld of indefinite detention where terrorist suspects named Muhammad are kept.

I’ll wager that the evidence against Posada, which I find compelling, is more solid than the secret evidence against most of the detainees at Guantanamo. But Posada’s alleged crimes were against the Castro regime. George W. Bush’s stance toward Cuba has been even more hardheaded and counterproductive than the policies of his predecessors. This administration has tightened the travel ban, increased economic pressure and made a show of planning for a post-Castro Cuba. Meanwhile, Castro (apparently recovering slowly from intestinal surgery) and his brother Raul are as firmly in power as ever. The administration’s hard-line tactics have accomplished less than nothing—in Cuba, at least.

The zero-tolerance policy toward the Castro government has been popular, however, among the most strident exiles in Florida—the old men who will greet Posada when he comes home to Miami and a comfortable retirement.

A grand jury in New Jersey reportedly is investigating Posada’s alleged involvement in the Havana hotel bombings, and it’s possible that he will someday face a new indictment. Meanwhile, our government has given Castro another cause celebre for billboards and demonstrations.

The administration is about to increase funding for its broadcasts into Cuba, even though they are seen and heard by few Cubans because Castro’s people have gotten so good at jamming them. The message is that the United States opposes the Castro regime but offers a hand of friendship to the Cuban people.

That’s a tough idea to sell when our government won’t call a terrorist a terrorist—and when a bitter old man who likely has killed scores of Cuban civilians is allowed to walk free.

Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at symbol)washpost.com.