Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Democrats: Most Certainly Will Get Fooled Again

Don't feel sorry for the Democrats. If not for their spinelessness and, in many instances, enthusiastic agreement with the Bush total war against Islam doctrine, they wouldn't be in the situation they now are - a large number of "rank and file" Democrats outside of Bushzarro world on the Potomac see their party leaders as part of the problem, not the solution, and will be hard-pressed to support them in the up-coming presidential election in 2008. Of course, considering the "two party" (or, more accurately, one party) political system in the United States, this leaves them without a viable candidate to vote for.

"Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Joseph Biden of Delaware, Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, John Kerry of Massachusetts and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina are mulling over running for the Democratic nomination," notes the San Francisco Chronicle. "All voted in October 2002 for a resolution authorizing the president to use force in Iraq." In other words, all of them are war criminals, or at minimum accessories after the fact. Instead of running for president, they should be running to hire high-powered attorneys, or running to foreign embassies to avoid arrest and seek sanctuary.

These weak-willed or warmongering Democrats will "no doubt... be forced to explain their positions - both then and now - and in doing so could open themselves to attack from candidates who didn’t support the resolution or didn’t have to cast the politically tricky vote," the Chronicle continues.

Of course, the only "presidential hopeful" Democrat who didn’t vote for slaughtering a hundred thousand or more innocent Iraqis was Russell Feingold—and he has a snowball's chance in hell of winning his party’s nomination, let alone actually taking up residency in the White House.